| Unified Communications (UC) Deployment – an insight |
| Written by Asheesh Pandia |
| Monday, 20 September 2010 12:05 |
|
Does it start with a CIO? Unified Communication is not another plug-in product but rather a multi-level integration process that involves re-engineering and alignment of applications into business processes to eventually produce a unified user experience, enhance productivity and boost operational efficiency. UC or Collaboration deployments are no one-shot games and definitely not a one-man show. Decisions that follow processes such as techno-economic feasibility, functional prioritization, overall compatibility check & future growth checks and mostly operational and business implications involve team participation and so it is not a straight top-level resolution. The whole process of planning, deployment and administration must involve several functions including IT & Operations mangers and other business experts. Strategic conceptualization and deployment that serves the business objectives & milestone goals optimally are chalked-out best when progressed up the ladder in proper sync. The Correct Method UC deployment is a transformation decision that demands a clear vision directly addressing the core business motivation and objectives. With a process focused approach, the integration might as well reflect positively on an organization’s service capabilities, business strategy and its customers’ experience – besides an impressive balance sheet of course! On the other hand, any collaboration or unification initiative is unlikely to succeed unless it surmounts a direct business obstacle. In a nutshell, the underlying principle for unification or collaboration in any business must be driven by the business needs rather than technological. Admittedly, there is no one right way; only a broad preferable approach - the one that lays sufficient stress upon a recognizable strategy to drive and deliver specific business value. For that matter, identifying the unification of communication channels as a Business Asset in the first place may result in intelligent decisions and thus make an appropriate approach! Common yet futile integration approach today among businesses is “brick-by-brick”, where in only a few specific applications are utilized in mostly an incoherent manner and whatever comes out of it is misconstrued as UC. It must be understood that unified communications is all about the experience wherein the user is empowered to reach the subject irrespective of the channel or the necessity to have known the channel in advance in order to save aborted attempts through automation or elimination. The same is more likely to be achieved by unification on and through compatible, IP-intelligent and converged networks that are both receptive & complementary to the convergence atmosphere. Vendor or Vendors Although it may offer seemingly easy management, given today’s industry scenario, single vendor strategy is generally not to be found. Reasons are several, namely, the lack of open-standard product portfolios or integration expertise among vendors and the unlikelihood of one-stop & all-in-one pack deployments owing to the ensuing depletion of existing infrastructure. Multiple vendor UC strategy, in contrast, gives the advantage of choice today unlike yesterday’s standardization-for-no-frills approach. Depending upon the compatibility, interoperability and level of integration, one may pick and choose the best-of-breed specks from the best vendors – similar to a configured personal computer as compared to the branded one. But then, one has to be prepared with the expertise to ensure that all such products and solutions can interoperate well as one. Infrastructure In order to minimize costs involved and to streamline the UC rollout; selection of a robust VoIP infrastructure is a common pre-requisite. Almost in every case, it is equally desirable to begin the convergence initiative with getting in place a secure IP Network that complements the implementation. Due diligence must be exercised to make certain that the network and other components attend to the technicalities of both the existing and planned convergence environment. Insufficient IP infrastructure may hamper the rollout at a later stage. Where as the right network and hardware guarantees cost-effective and easier implementation with the ability of transition and upgrade. The author drives Communications for Siemens Enterprise Communications, India. |
Latest News
SouthAmerica.travel Opens a Seattle Travel Agency Office
14 April 2012 20:40
(1888PressRelease) The South America travel agency SouthAmerica.travel has just moved into the Seattle neighborhood. The new Seattle travel agency will be a sales and marketing office that books...
14 April 2012 20:40
- 14 April 2012 20:40 Premier Inn Brings GBP12 Million to the Most Central London Site to Date
- 14 April 2012 15:40 Popular Chiropractic Consultant Reveals the Biggest Marketing Game-Changer of 2012
- 14 April 2012 15:40 Arif Gangji Named Small Business Person of the Year in Thornton, Colorado
- 14 April 2012 00:00 Nicaragua to Strengthen Economic Ties with the State of Georgia
Most Popular PR's
- The Dot Net Factory Partners with Microsoft To Support Microsoft Identity
- iBAHN Appoints New EMEA Vice President And Managing Director
- Cabinet NG Recognized as a "Best Channel Vendor 2009" by Business Solutions Magazine
- Now Non-English Speaking Web Surfers Can Read News In Their Own Language Through Amazing Internet Shortcuts
- Extreme Networks Introduces 40 Gigabit Ethernet
Search Local Services and Information
Browse by state
» All Local Guides
» Alabama
» Alaska
» Arizona
» Arkansas
» California
» Colorado
» Connecticut
» DC
» Delaware
» Florida
» Georgia
» Hawaii
» Idaho
» Illinois
» Indiana
» Iowa
» Kansas
» Kentucky
» Louisiana
» Maine
» Maryland
» Massachusetts
» Michigan
» Minnesota
» Mississippi
» Alabama
» Alaska
» Arizona
» Arkansas
» California
» Colorado
» Connecticut
» DC
» Delaware
» Florida
» Georgia
» Hawaii
» Idaho
» Illinois
» Indiana
» Iowa
» Kansas
» Kentucky
» Louisiana
» Maine
» Maryland
» Massachusetts
» Michigan
» Minnesota
» Mississippi
» Missouri
» Montana
» Nebraska
» Nevada
» New Hampshire
» New Jersey
» New Mexico
» New York
» North Carolina
» North Dakota
» Ohio
» Oklahoma
» Oregon
» Pennsylvania
» Rhode Island
» South Carolina
» South Dakota
» Tennessee
» Texas
» Utah
» Vermont
» Virginia
» Washington
» West Virginia
» Wisconsin
» Wyoming
» Montana
» Nebraska
» Nevada
» New Hampshire
» New Jersey
» New Mexico
» New York
» North Carolina
» North Dakota
» Ohio
» Oklahoma
» Oregon
» Pennsylvania
» Rhode Island
» South Carolina
» South Dakota
» Tennessee
» Texas
» Utah
» Vermont
» Virginia
» Washington
» West Virginia
» Wisconsin
» Wyoming

